Overview
Philip Nelson counsels clients in all stages of growth, from startups to established public companies. To jump-start young portfolios, Mr. Nelson pioneered use of special programs to cut through red tape for rapid patent allowance. For those wanting to preserve options at minimal cost, he has a tested protocol. He especially enjoys laying sophisticated patent minefields, protecting core assets with an eye to the future concept and product pipeline. No matter when he joins the team, he quickly grasps the technology and points to the best options to support the business.
Mr. Nelson builds value for investment and acquisition by working with company visionaries and scientists to describe and protect their ideas. Although the patent office likes to say “no,” he works through the objections, often speaking to patent examiners in person to negotiate for better claims. Collegial persistence and technical tutorials tend to persuade examiners, getting them to “yes.”
Mr. Nelson drafts and negotiates technology agreements and advises on big-picture strategy. When opposing diligence counsel is just pasting in a pat phrase from a template, he uses his experience from the trenches (prosecuting, negotiating, and litigating) to correct the meaning and serve his clients.
Mr. Nelson advises on contested matters, drafts litigation briefs, and works closely with litigator colleagues. He negotiates with his clients’ adversaries to avoid suit or improve litigation positions. When a competitor claimed to own his client’s invention in chemistry lab instruments, he won three patent office “interferences”—and three Federal Circuit appeals—to preserve his client’s ownership rights. He handles complex patent office trials such as interferences, derivations, and inter-partes reviews. He has been handling reexaminations and inter-partes reexaminations since before they were cool (before the America Invents Act popularized Board proceedings).
His physics background and widely varied experience at a top intellectual property boutique for 20 years has created a sophisticated advocate for his clients. Mr. Nelson looks forward to helping you assess the field, build your defenses, close your deal, and rain fire on your IP problems and adversaries.
Clerk Experience
Extern to the Honorable Judge Randall R. Rader at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2002.
Education
- Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Jr. Law School (J.D., 2003), cum laude, Senior Editor - BYU Law Review
- Brigham Young University (B.S. Physics, 2000), magna cum laude, University Honors, Minor in Mathematics, Student Speaker - University Honors Graduation
Affiliations
- Board Member of the OC Chapter of the Federalist Society
News & Insights
Articles
Contributor, The Federalist Society (FedSoc) Blog (View Author Archive)
- “Patent Bills With Bipartisan Support Might Beat Congressional Gridlock,” The FedSoc Blog, September 18, 2024
- “Patent Office Fee and Procedure Changes: Nudging or Sludging?” The FedSoc Blog, July 5, 2024
- “The Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA): A Proposal for Section 101 Reform,” The FedSoc Blog, March 11, 2024
- “The PREVAIL Act: Reforming Patent Challenges at the USPTO,” The FedSoc Blog, January 15, 2024
- “Patent Eligibility Restoration Act: Boon or Burden to Patent Incentives?” The FedSoc Blog, September 19, 2023
Editor, Knobbe Martens Section 101 Blog
- Patent Eligibility Reform Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives (September 6, 2024)
- Current Congressional Attempts at Patent Reform (January 30, 2024)
- Momentum Builds for Supreme Court Review of American Axle, Clarification of Patent Eligibility Law (June 22, 2022)
- Effect of USPTO’s October 2019 101 Guidance (October 17, 2019)
- Co-Author, 101 Patent Reform Progressing in Congress (May 28, 2019)
- Legislators Propose “Section 101 Reform (April 18, 2019)
- Big Picture on Software Patent Eligibility: The Forces at Work (January 25, 2019)
- Co-Author, New 101 Guidance from USPTO – What Does It Change? (January 8, 2019)
- Co-Author, Will New PTO Guidance Be The Antidote to Alice In The Medical Device Patenting Process? (December 5, 2018)
- Federal Circuit Further Expands the Role of Factual Questions in Section 101 Analysis (October 22, 2018)
- Improved User Interface Survives Section 101 Challenges (March 16, 2018)
Contributor, Knobbe Martens Medical Device Blog
- Co-Author, Recent Developments in Medical Casts (December 4, 2023)
- FDA Statements and Patent Disclosures (August 11, 2023)
- Co-Author, FDA Updates Cybersecurity Guidance (June 2, 2023)
Contributor, Knobbe Martens Data Privacy Blog
- Co-Author, European Commission Refreshes Standard Contractual Clauses (July 13, 2021)
- Under U.S. Law, Freedom of Speech Trumps any Right to be Forgotten (June 14, 2021)
- Co-Author, Class Action Against Google Over COVID-19 Contact Tracking App Highlights New Layers of Data Privacy Consideration (May 11, 2021)
- Co-Author, Judge Allows Facebook to Settle Facial Scanning Suit for $650 Million (March 19, 2021)
- Co-Author, Comprehensive, Round Two: Virginia Passes the Second General Data Privacy Law (March 8, 2021)
- Co-Author, Measuring the Reach of GDPR, How Far Is Far Enough? (February 25, 2021)
- Co-Author, California Court Determines the CCPA Does Not Restrict Discovery in Civil Litigation (February 17, 2021)
- Co-Author, Institutions Propose Digital Health Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic (January 5, 2021)
- Co-Author, EU Recommendations Require Careful Analysis but Offer Few Clear Rules (December 14, 2020)
- Co-Author, Voters Choose Privacy at the Ballot Box (November 16, 2020)
- Co-Author, New York New COVID-19 Testing Mandate Struggles to Balance Traveler Privacy and Public Health (November 9, 2020)
- Co-Author, Amendment to CCPA Harmonizes Data Privacy and Healthcare Information Requirements – Exemptions for de-Identified Patient Information Under AB 713 Address HIPAA and CCPA Standards (November 4, 2020)
- Co-Author, Lessons From the Complaint Against Uber’s Former Chief Security Officer (September 15, 2020)
Legislative Developments in Patents: Prospects for the PREVAIL and RESTORE Acts and PERA in 2025, IP Watchdog (January 2, 2025)
How 2 Proposed Bills Could Transform Patent Law, Law360 (October 24, 2024)
Apple Loses Patent In Fight With Masimo At PTAB, Law360 (October 3, 2024)
Quoted in, “How counsel balance USPTO and court edicts on Section 101,” Published by Managing IP (March 2021)
Should Medical Device Companies Be Toasting A New Year’s Regulation? Medical Product Outsourcing (January 8, 2019)
Co-Author, “Legal Alert: Good News for Software Patents?” (May 13, 2016)
Co-Author, “The U.S. Supreme Court’s Increasing Involvement In Patent Law,” Corporate LiveWire (December 2014)
Co-Author and Guest Contributor, “Considerations for International Inventions – Foreign Filing Licenses,” Patently-O (October 22, 2014)
Final Rules Released for Supplemental Examination – What You Need To Know (August 30, 2012)
Congress’ New Invention – An Update to U.S. Patent Law, Orange County Business Journal (November 21, 2011)
Contributor, Pre-Litigation Patent Enforcement, 2011-2012 ed., Published by Thomson West (October 2011)
Expedited Patent Handling A Priority? (September 21, 2011)
New Prioritized Patent Examination Option – USPTO Will Allow Applicants to Pay for Faster Examination (April 7, 2011)
Speeches & Seminars
Strategic Considerations in Applicant Duty of Disclosure and Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Submissions – Knobbe Martens Webinar (February 2021)
US Patent Office Updates – Trends and Changes in View of the USPTO’s “Revised” Guidance on Patent Eligible Subject Matter (January 2019)