Overview
Susan Natland advises on all aspects of domestic and international brand protection and enforcement, advertising law, unfair competition, copyright, internet law, and data privacy. By investing the necessary time to understanding her client’s business and specific goals, Susan delivers solutions that maximize efficiencies and opportunities. Responsive, accountable and results-oriented, Susan is dedicated to serving as both a trusted legal and business advisor.
Susan is Co-Chair of the firm’s Trademark and Brand Protection Group. Her practice includes domestic and foreign trademark selection and searches, trademark procurement and prosecution, ex parte and inter partes proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), trademark audits, licensing, domain name disputes, counterfeit goods and customs, copyrights, entertainment law, rights of publicity, trademark and copyright enforcement and litigation, and trademark and copyright issues related to AI. A hands-on advocate for her client’s rights, Susan has even personally attended raids of counterfeit goods warehouses in China. Susan also counsels clients on trademark and copyright issues related to artificial intelligence (AI).
Susan was appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and is the immediate past Chair of the USPTO Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC) which advises the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and the Director of the USPTO on matters relating to the policies, goals, performance, budget, and user fees of the USPTO. During her term as Chair of TPAC, Susan submitted a report to the President of the United States, and launched the first ever trademark award for stakeholders in the history of the USPTO. Susan was described by her TPAC colleagues as “a high-level thinker who also executes and rolls up her sleeves to dive into details and do the work that needs to be done.” Susan is also extremely active in the International Trademark Association (INTA), has served as Chair of its Enforcement Committee and on several INTA Presidential Task Forces (among other roles), currently serves on the Political Action Committee (PAC), and is currently Co-Chair of the INTA Presidential Task Force – “Unlocking IP”. Susan currently serves as Vice-Chair of the USPTO ChIPs Chapter, and is a strong advocate for comprehensive innovation and entrepreneurship in the IP ecosystem.
Notably, Susan worked as a virtual in-house trademark counsel for a major Internet retailer for nearly two years. This experience allowed her to take an active role in business decisions and provided her with insight into business drivers and concerns. In addition to her trademark and brand protection expertise, Susan is also a registered patent attorney with the USPTO and a certified data privacy specialist with IAPP CIPP/US Data Privacy Certification.
Susan represents clients that range from fast-growth, emerging companies to established brands in a variety of industries, such as entertainment, fashion and apparel, food and beverage, automotive, cosmetics, healthcare, medical and dental, financial, computer hardware and software, telecommunications, e-commerce and direct sale retail, toys, and sports and entertainment. A sampling of her clients are Rivian, Mattel, lululemon, The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, Fox Media, Acorns Grow, Darigold, Arbonne International, Thorne Research, ChromaDex, Revolve Clothing, St. John Knits, Chico’s, White House Black Market, Public Storage, Nobel Biocare, Illumina, Thai Union (Chicken of the Sea), Viant, and Olaplex.
Chambers ranked, recipient of the Lexology “Client Choice” award (exclusively based on client input) multiple times, recognized as one of the 80 most influential Women in IP Worldwide, shortlisted several years as Trademark Lawyer of the Year, and repeatedly voted as one of the top trademark lawyers in the country by a variety of business and legal publications, Susan has earned her reputation as a consummate professional that is also a fierce advocate for her clients. Susan takes the time to learn about her client’s business, the key players involved, and the market in which they operate. In return, Susan’s clients value her integrity and work ethic, and that she is a talented lawyer and proven strategist that balances complex legal issues with pragmatic business considerations.
Susan served on Knobbe Martens Executive Committee and is also a member of the firm’s Diversity Committee, as well as a contributor to the firm’s Fashion Blog. Susan has also been an adjunct professor at UCLA School of Law, teaching advanced Trademark Law, and is Guest Lecturer at UCI School of Law, Southern Illinois School of Law, and Chapman School of Law (Music and Entertainment Law). Susan is also active in the local business community and has volunteered for the Los Angeles Downtown Women’s Center and Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce. Moreover, she participates in many local charitable events such as the Anti-Defamation League, the Public Law Center, and SIMA (Surfing Industry Manufacturers Association). Susan is also a Brand Ambassador for her client BEEK.
Clerk Experience
- Honorable Judge John T. Noonan, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Education
- University of California - Los Angeles - School of Law (UCLA) (J.D., 1998), American Jurisprudence Award in Civil Procedure, Teaching Assistant for Legal Research and Writing
- University of California - Santa Barbara (UCSB) (B.A. Economics, 1993), Honors, with emphasis in biology, Dean’s list
Representative Matters
Kinetic Lighting, Inc. v. Christopher Bauder (TTAB)
Successfully defended opposition filed against client’s KINETIC LIGHTS and Design application. Ms. Natland successfully argued the Oral Hearing. In a complete defense verdict, after full trial briefing, the TTAB dismissed Kinetic Lighting’s opposition finding that KINETIC LIGHTING was highly descriptive of the opposer’s goods and services, and Kinetic Lighting could not show secondary meaning in the term despite its over 20 years of use of the term. Thus, the TTAB found that Kinetic Lighting did not have protectable trademark rights upon which to base the opposition.
Public Storage Operating Company v. Charles D. Burrus Family Trust (C.D. Cal)
Represented Public Storage, a leader in the self-storage industry, against a Southern California competitor in a trademark infringement action. Obtained summary judgment in Public Storage’s favor on every claim and defense in the case, including that the Defendant infringed the inherently distinctive and commercially strong PUBLIC STORAGE® trademark.
Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. lululemon athletica Canada Inc. and lululemon USA Inc. (Case No. 21-55775) (9th Cir.)
Successfully defeated an appeal of the district court’s decision of non-infringement in connection with allegations by Aliign Activation Wear that lululemon infringed its trademark by using the mark ALIGN in connection with a yoga product collection.
Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. lululemon athletica Canada Inc. and lululemon USA Inc (Case 2:20-cv-03339-SVW-JEM) (C.D. Cal)
Successfully defended lululemon in trademark infringement suit filed in connection with lululemon’s ALIGN yoga product collection. Obtained summary judgment of no infringement, including no forward confusion, reverse confusion or initial interest confusion between the parties’ products, which avoided the plaintiff’s damages claims exceeding several hundred million dollars.
eCU Technology, LLC v. CU Direct Corporation, Case No. 3:19-cv-01973-C (N.D. Tex.)
Represented Defendant, CU Direct, in trademark infringement suit in connection with CU Direct’s ORIGENCE mark. Successfully defended against motion for preliminary injunction and obtained favorable settlement for client.
Public Storage v. AAA Public Storage, 4:18-CV-00024-ALM (E.D. Tex)
Represented Plaintiff, Public Storage, in trademark infringement suit. Case settled favorably for client with Defendant’s complete and immediate cease of use of the infringing mark.
GameChanger Charity v. Playnext, 8:18-cv-2142 (C.D. Cal)
Represented Plaintiff, GameChanger Charity, in trademark infringement suit. Case settled favorably for client with Playnext’s complete and immediate cease of use of the infringing mark.
Zaletel v. Prisma Labs, 1:16-cv-01307-SLR (D. Delaware)
Successfully defended Prisma Labs against Motion for Preliminary Injunction in trademark infringement suit. The case was thereafter withdrawn by Plaintiff in complete victory for our client.
Arbonne International v. AS Colour, 8:16-cv-00608 (C.D. Cal)
Represented Plaintiff, Arbonne International, in trademark infringement suit. Case settled favorably for client.
Arbonne International v. Slimgenics, 1:16-cv-01874-CMA (D. Colorado)
Represented Defendant Arbonne International, in trademark infringement suit. Case settled favorably for client.
Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. v. Urban Decay Cosmetics, 2:12-cv-00693-GLF-MRA (S.D. Ohio)
Represented Defendant and Counter Claimant, Urban Decay Cosmetics, in connection with declaratory judgment suit involving the NAKED mark. Case settled favorably for client resulting in complete phase-out of accused Victoria’s Secret product.
Broadcom Corp. v. BroadVoice, Inc., SACV05-431 DOC (C.D. Cal)
Represented Plaintiff, Broadcom Corporation, in trademark infringement suit. Case settled favorably for client.
Illumina, Inc. v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. (TTAB)
Represented Illumina in oppositions and cancellation actions against Meridian Bioscience’s registrations and applications for the marks ILLUMIGENE and ILLUMIPRO. Received complete victory after full trial briefing and trial decision on the merits by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Illumina, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (TTAB)
Represented Illumina in opposition proceeding relating to Boston Scientific’s application for the mark ILLUMINA 3D. Case settled favorably for client.
My Horse Player, Inc. (TTAB)
Represented My Horse Player, Inc. in an ex parte proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in which the Board’s decision on appeal reversed the Examining Attorney by finding that MY HORSE PLAYER is not descriptive and is registrable on the Principal Register.
Hurley International LLC v. Volta (TTAB)
Represented Hurley International LLC as Plaintiff in a precedential decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, finding on summary judgment that the Defendants had committed fraud on the USPTO. Listed by Allen’s Trademark Digest as one of the top ten trademark cases before the TTAB that year.
Jose Remacle (TTAB)
Represented Jose Remacle in a precedential decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, reversing the Examining Attorney and finding that the mark BIO-CD is not descriptive and is registrable on the Principal Register.
Recognition
Awards & Honors
Susan has received multiple awards and has been honored in both national and international forums for her legal accomplishments:
- Recognized in Lexology Index: IP 2025 guide for outstanding Trademark work
- Recognized by The Legal 500 “United States” for Trademarks: Non-Contentious (2024)
- Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Chambers USA, Knobbe Martens Partners and Practices Recognized in 2024 Edition of Chambers USA | Knobbe Martens (June 2024)
- Recognized as a Trademark Star in Managing IP’‘s “2024 IP STARS” (June 2024)
- Recognized in the Top 250 Women in IP by Managing IP (June 2024)
- Recognized in World Trademark Review 1000: The World’s Leading Trademark Professionals guide (2024)
- Shortlisted as Trademark Lawyer of the Year in the 2024 Women in Business Awards by Managing IP
- California Recorder Mentor/Mentee Award Finalist (with Kate McMorrow)(October 2023)
- Recognized as a “World IP Leader” in 2022 – 2024 for her excellent work in Trademark by World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR)
- Recognized in the 2022 edition of Euromoney’s Expert Guides – Women in Business Law for Trademark/Copyrights
- Recognized as a Trademark Star in Managing IP’s “IP STARS” guide for her outstanding intellectual property legal work (2018 – 2023)
- Recognized in the World Trademark Review (WTR) 1000 as a “Leading Trademark Lawyer” (2012 – 2023). Placed in top tier of WTR Rankings in both categories—“Enforcement and Litigation” and “Prosecution and Strategy”. In 2023, she was described as someone who is “highly appreciated as a hands-on partner who fights hard for her patrons,” while noting her work as “lead outside trademark counsel for Fox Corporation, cybersecurity solutions leader Fortinet and many other prestigious names.” In the 2022 guide, she was recommended for her “excellent leadership”. In the 2021 guide, Susan was recognized for her deep involvement in the practice and her “niche insight in data privacy” was highlighted. In the 2020 guide, Susan was noted for adding “tremendous value for brand owners with her blend of trademark, advertising, unfair competition and data privacy expertise”. In the 2019 guide, editors described her as “an eminent all-rounder” and “has a glowing reputation in the fashion and entertainment industries”. In the 2018 guide, editors praised her “sensible and judicious approach” after taking on the role of lead trademark counsel after the Avago-Broadcom acquisition. In 2017, she was commended for her work with Broadcom in connection with its purchase by Avago Technologies for $37 billion – one of the largest tech deals ever and was praised for “constantly remaining professional, while fighting hard and fair.”
- Nominated for the Orange County Business Journal’s Women in Business Award (2021)
- Recognized in The Legal 500 “United States” for being an outstanding practitioner (2015, 2019 – 2023). In this guide, she was noted for providing strategic protection, branding and enforcement advice to domestic and international brands, such as Urban Decay, Kate Spade New York and Arbonne.
- Named “Best in Trademarks” in Legal Media Group‘s (LMG) “Women in Business Law” guide (2015, 2020)
- Named a “Southern California Super Lawyers” for her work in intellectual property law by Super Lawyers magazine (2017 – 2020). She has repeatedly been selected as a “Super Lawyer” in a survey of her peers since 2011. From 2013 to 2016, she was also named one of the “Top Women Attorneys” in Southern California.
- Named in Managing IP’s prestigious “Top 250 Women in IP” international list and shortlisted for Trademark Lawyer of the Year (2019 and 2020)
- Recognized by World IP Review (WIPR) as one of the 80 Most Influential Women in IP worldwide in 2019
- Selected as the exclusive winner of the “Client Choice Award” in the Intellectual Property: Trademarks, California category by International Law Office (ILO) (2014, 2017 – 2018). Uniquely, the Client Choice Awards are based solely on nominations and feedback from corporate in-house counsel.
- Recognized as one of the “Top 50 Most Powerful Women Technology,” from California Diversity Council in 2017
- Recognized as one of the “Top 50 Women Lawyers in California,” from Top 50 Women Lawyers.org in 2017
- Named to the 2016, 2017 and 2023 Daily Journal list of “Top IP Lawyers in California”.
- Named in the 2017 “Top Women Lawyer” list highlighting Susan as an influencer and achiever for her impact in the technology industry by the California Diversity Council.
- Recognized in the 2016 “Who’s Who Legal: Trademarks” list as one of the most highly regarded individuals on the West Coast in the U.S. She ranks among the very elite of US practitioners in Who’s Who Legal research and was widely regarded as a “brand enforcement superstar” by her peers.
- Recognized in Law Business Research’s 2015 and 2016 “Who’s Who Legal 100”
- Named a “Top Attorney in Orange County” by Orange Coast Magazine for her professional achievement in 2016
- Recognized as a leading Trademark Law practitioner in Legal Media Group‘s (LMG) “Guide to the World’s Leading Trademark Law Practitioners” in 2014
- Named one of Orange County’s top lawyers by OC Metro magazine in the categories of copyright law and intellectual property law (2009, 2010, 2011 and 2013)
- Named one of the top trademark attorneys in California, based on a comprehensive survey of both general counsel and private practice lawyers, in the Law Business Research “Who’s Who Legal: California” and one of the top trademark attorneys in the world in the “Who’s Who Legal: Trademarks” which referred to her as a “real trademark specialist” (2008 – 2019, 2023)
- Named as one of Southern California’s “Rising Stars” in intellectual property law, based on survey of her peers, in Los Angeles Magazine and Super Lawyers Magazine (2005)
Affiliations
- International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) (2015 – Present)
- International Trademark Association (INTA)
- INTA involvement is extensive from 2022 to the present, and her current committee involvement alone is:
- Board Member Political Action Committee | 3/18/2023 – Present
- INTA PAC Capitol Club: Rotunda | 12/15/2021 – Present
- Women’s LeadershIP Initiative Project Team | 1/31/2024 – Present
- Academic Committee | 1/1/2024 – Present
- Professor and Adjunct Subcommittee | 1/1/2024 – Present
- INTA PAC Capitol Club: Rotunda | 12/8/2021 – Present
- Annual Meeting Project Team (Atlanta) | 9/26/2023 – 6/30/2024
- Co-Chair Presidential Task Force – Unlocking IP | 1/1/2023 – 6/30/2024
- INTA involvement is extensive from 2022 to the present, and her current committee involvement alone is:
- INTA Presidential Task Force (2020 – Present)
- INTA Data Protection Committee (2018 – Present)
- INTA TMAP (Trademark Admistrators and Practitioners) Conference Project Team (2018)
- INTA Leadership Development Committee (2014 – 2018)
- Project Team Co-Chair for Leadership Academy (2014 – 2018)
- INTA Enforcement Committee (2006 – 2013)
- Chair of Enforcement Committee (2012 – 2013)
- Vice Chair of Enforcement Committee (2010 – 2011)
- Chair of Opposition & Cancellation Standards and Procedures Subcommittee (2008 – 2010)
- INTA Small and Medium-Enterprises Task Force (2010 – 2011)
- INTA 2011 Annual Meeting Conference Project Team (2010 – 2011)
- INTA 2005 Annual Meeting Conference Project Team (2005)
- INTA Roundtable Committee (2004 – 2006)
- INTA Anti-Counterfeiting and Enforcement Committee (2002 – 2004)
- Orange County Patent Law Association (OCPLA)
- Chair of Trademark Committee
- Orange County Bar Association
News & Insights
Articles
Co-author, feature article, “Unlocking IP: INTA’s Media Mission,” INTA, July 2024
Co-author, “The INFORM Consumers Act: What Online Retailers, Consumers, and Brands Need to Know,” Knobbe Martens, July 2023
“No Shortcuts to Success: Knobbe’s Susan Natland on the Importance of Leading by Example,” The Recorder, October 2023
Co-author, “USPTO’s Trademark Public Advisory Committee: Where we’ve been and where we’re headed,” USPTO Director’s Blog, February 2023
Co-author, “USPTO Changes Office Action Response Time For Non-Madrid U.S. Trademark Applications,” Knobbe Martens, January 2023
“A Trademarks for Humanity Act Would Lift Companies, Consumers,” Bloomberg Law, January 2023
Co-author, “Predictions in 3 Key Areas for IP Practitioners This Year,” Law360, January 2023
Featured in “Career Series: Susan Natland,” published by World Intellectual Property Review, April 2022
INTA Provides Tips for Transferring Personal Information from the EU, INTA, April 2021
Podcast: Knobbe Martens Attorneys Discuss Counterfeiting and IP Theft, Footwear Insight Extra, February 2021
UNITED STATES: Applicants Must Prove Plans to Use a Mark, INTA, September 2020
Data Protection Committee Update: The Effect of a Data Breach on Brand Value, International Trademark Association, March 2020
How High Court May Resolve Generic’.Com’ TM Issue, Law360, November 2019
Ready, Set, Go! Fast Track to California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Compliance, Knobbe Martens Firm Alert, October 2019
No Place To Hide – The Effect of a Data Breach on Brand Value, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Blog, August 2019
“Adidas v Skechers: was a preliminary injunction proper?,” World Trademark Review, June 2018
“No likelihood of confusion between chevron marks,” World Trademark Review, November 2017
“What’s in a name? TTAB refuses registration of OLIN mark,” World Trademark Review, October 2017
“The Battle of the Earnhardts,” World Trademark Review, September 2017
“Likelihood of Confusion Vaporised in Beauty Industry Case,” World Trademark Review, July 2017
“MillersCoors Hops to Victory Using Effective Disclaimers,” World Trademark Review, June 2017
A New Direction? Data Privacy and the FTC, Intellectual Property Magazine, March 2017
Grey market Abbott goods deemed infringing, World Trademark Review, January 2017
Permanent injunction results in lack of standing, World Trademark Review, October 2016
Ready, Set, Go! Fast Track to California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Compliance, Knobbe Martens Firm Alert, October 2019
Amazon’s clear labelling defeats MTM trademark claims, World Trademark Review, April 2016
When the cost of default is $1.2 million, World Trademark Review, February 2016
Alert: California and the EU’s Changing Privacy Laws, December 2015
GoDaddy victorious in dispute over OSCARS and ACADEMY AWARDS marks, World Trademark Review, September 2015
Nuisance Repeat Filing Resolution: An Interview with the Enforcement Committee, INTA Bulletin, April 2015
Tacking isn’t tacky – narrow doctrine saves defendant, World Trademark Review, January 2014
SPI in high spirits after suit against STOLI marks is dismissed for lack of standing, World Trademark Review, September 2013
No shades of grey: TTAB finds “white” deceptive for black tea, World Trademark Review, April 2013
Madrid Protocol registrations not insulated from petition to cancel based on abandonment, World Trademark Review, October 2012
Advertising at the Olympics – Let the Games Begin!, Convergence (an International Bar Association publication), Orange County Business Journal and Law360, July 2012
Ninth Circuit recognizes protectable trade dress for skull-shaped vodka bottle, World Trademark Review, June 2012
Time to Review – Achieving Best Practices in Trademark Audits, World Trademark Review, March 2012
Mark for Coffee House Likely to Cause Confusion with Coffee Certification Mark, World Trademark Review, March 2012
Nearly $300,000 awarded to plaintiff in keyword case against competitor, World Trademark Review, February 2011
Eighth Circuit: actual confusion is not a prerequisite to monetary relief, World Trademark Review, January 2011
Common U.S. Marines Slogan Remains in Public Domain, World Trademark Review, October 2010
Use of Identical Mark is Circumstantial Evidence of Dilution, World Trademark Review, July 2010
A TTAB Finds Mark Disparaging For Use with Wine, World Trademark Review, April 2010
Plaintiff Has Its Cake, May Not Eat It Too, World Trademark Review, December 2009
Trademark “Squatter” Enjoined From Using JAPONAIS Mark, World Trademark Review, September 2009
Eight-year delay bars claim that REDSKINS mark disparages Native American, World Trademark Review, July 2009
Heartbrand beefs with Yahoo!, World Trademark Review, May 2009
Hershey Garners Sweet Victory Against Furniture Company, World Trademark Review, December 2008
Hobbit Sleeps on Rights, Says Court, World Trademark Review, August 2008
Google’s Motion to Dismiss AdSense Complaint Rejected, World Trademark Law Report, July 2008
Focus on Fraud: Still Treacherous Territory in the U.S., INTA Bulletin, June 2008
The Importance of Trademark Audits, INTA Bulletin, March 2008
HOT WHEELS summary judgment spins out in Ninth, World Trademark Law Report, 2007
TTAB applies more lenient Section 2(d) test in FIRST NIAGARA, World Trademark Law Report, July 2007
Trademark Management: The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth, World Trademark Review, April 2007
Jonathan Livingston Seagull Claims Survive Summary Judgment Motion, World Trademark Law Report, April 11, 2007
Trademark Audits – what you need to know, World Trademark Review, May 2006
Speeches & Seminars
How to Avoid False Advertising and Create Effective Endorsement Guidelines, Association of Corporate Counsel (June 2024)
Capsule Keynote: “Unlocking IP”—How to Frame Communications with Non-IP Stakeholders and Customers, International Trademark Association Annual Meeting (May 2024)
Getting the Best Out of Generative AI, Best Practices in IP Conference (April 2024)
IP Checklist for Your Business (Master Class), Best Practices in Intellectual Property Conference in Israel (April 2024)
Strategies, Options and Evidence for Non-Use Cancellation Actions Before the USPTO, INTA Pre-Annual Meeting Event in Turkey (April 2024)
Trademark Enforcement Methods and Surveys from a Practitioner Perspective, University of Florida Law School, Levin College of Law (November 2023)
Speaker “LIVE Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Oral Argument,” 11th Annual ABA-IPL Trademark Days with the USPTO (October 2023)
Keynote Q&A With Deputy Director of the USPTO, Derrick Brent, LAIPLA Washington in the West Conference (March 2023)
Moderator, AI, NFTs and the Metaverse: The role of Trademarks and Copyrights, Best Practices in Intellectual Property conference in Israel (March 2023)
IP Strategies for Start-Ups, International Bar Association (IBA) Silicon Beach Conference (January 2023)
Trademarks, the Metaverse, and NFTs, Oh My!, Knobbe Martens Webinar (October 2022)
Hot Topic: Trademarks, the Metaverse and NFTs, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (September 2022)
Moderator, Liar Liar Pants on Fire: How to Detect Dishonesty with Body Language, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (September 2022)
Chat with Susan Natland, Chair of the USPTO’s Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC), Hosted by getcruise.com (June 2022)
Keynote Speaker for Employee Resource Group (ERG) Women in Leadership Development (WILD), CU Direct (November 2021)
Q&A with Former Deputy Director of the US Patent and Trademark Office and Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (October 2021)
Guest on the MENTOR dna podcast “Susan Natland, Sr. Partner Knobbe Martens” (October 2021)
Q&A Virtual Mentorship Event with Shannon Higginson, GC of lululemon (acted as moderator) (May 2021)
Trademark Enforcement Methods and Surveys from a Practitioner Perspective, Southern Illinois University Law School (March 2021 and November 2021)
Navigating the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), So. Cal In-House Counsel (December 2020)
The “Hoppy” Taste of Victory: Effective Online Brand Enforcement, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (November 2020)
The Impact of Data Protection and Privacy Regulations on Online Brand Enforcement, IBA Conference (November 2020)
Knobbe Practice Series: Developments in Data Privacy Laws Across Various U.S. States Webinar (June 2020)
A Practical Guide to Online Brand Enforcement, Knobbe Practice Series Webinar (June 2020)
Keynote Q&A With Director of the USPTO, Andrei Iancu, LAIPLA Washington in the West Conference (January 2020)
How To Not Strike Out With The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Knobbe Martens Webinar (June 2019)
Cost of a Data Breach and Affect on Brand Value, International Trademark Association Annual (INTA) Meeting (2019)
Data Privacy California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, SoCal IT Roundtable (March 2019)
How Not to Strike Out with the CCPA, Private Event (March 2019)
Top Ten IP Issues and Trends, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (January 2019)
Knobbe Data Privacy Seminar, SD (October 2018)
Trademarks Meets Marketing, Meets Advertising and Find Data Privacy Lurking Behind the Door, INTA TMAP Conference (September 2018)
Conducting Ethical Trademark Investigations, INTA TMAP Conference (September 2018)
The Complex World of Data Privacy and Security in the Medical Space, DeviceAlliance and Knobbe Martens Seminar (August 2018)
Trademark Protection in China, Managing Intellectual Property Global Trademark Forum (March 2018)
GDPR, Data Breaches & Federal Agency Actions, Knobbe Martens Data Privacy Seminar (March 2018)
Data Privacy – What Keeps In-House Counsel Up at Night, Association of Corporate Counsel (January 2018)
Implications with the Use of Mobile Devices in the Health Care Industry, New York State Bar Association Fall Meeting (October 2017)
Trademarks, Data Protection, and the FTC – OH MY, International Trademark Association Annual (INTA) Meeting (2017)
The Social Network: Key IP Concerns in Social Media, Automobile Club of Southern California (May 2017)
Keys to Creating, Protecting and Ethically Enforcing Brands, Filipino Lawyers of Orange County (FLOC) CLE Event (2017)
The Future of the Law, Chapman School of Law (Chapman Law Review Symposium) (2017)
“What We’ve Got Here is a Failure to Communicate” – False Advertising in the Social Media Space, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2016)
War Games: Recent IP Litigation, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2015)
Guest Lecturer, Chapman School of Law (Music and Entertainment Law) (2015)
Panelist, Chapman Entertainment and Sports Law Symposium, Chapman Law School (2015)
The Intersection of False Advertising Claims and the FDCA, OCBA Entertainment and Sports Section (2015)
Scams, Schemes, and Spoofs: Online Brand Protection, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2015)
The Intersection of False Advertising Claims and the FDCA, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2014)
The Intersection of False Advertising Claims and the FDCA, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2014)
Avoiding False Advertising & Unfair Competition, IP Impact Silicon Valley – Trademark Seminar (2013)
Financing of Litigation in Trademark Actions, International Trademark Association (INTA) Annual Meeting (2013)
Silver Linings Playbook: Best Practices in Trademark Clearance and Selection, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2013)
Swimming with Piranhas: Avoiding Trade Secret Misappropriation, False Advertising & Unfair Competition Claims, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2013)
Soarin’ Over Your Trademarks: Keys to Monetizing Your Brands, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2012)
Navigating the Murky Waters of the New Top Level Domain Name Launch, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2012)
Trademark and Copyright Clearance Scenarios: A Lawyer’s Day at the Happiest Place on Earth…. Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2011)
Trademarks in Sports: Ambush Marketing, International Trademark Association (INTA) Annual Meeting (2011)
Keywords and Trademarks, Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) (2010)
Media Mentions
Quoted in, “Talking About IP to “Non-IP” Audiences”, an article published by International Trademark Association (May 2024)
Featured in, “Unlocking Intellectual Property“, an article published by International Trademark Association (May 2024)
Featured in Los Angeles Times “Orange County Visionaries” Report (October 2023)
Quoted in, “US trademark landscape: predictions and cases to follow in 2023,” an article published by World Trademark Review (January 2023)
USPTO work highlighted in, Orange County Register (February 2022)
Quoted in “Kathi Vidal nominated as USPTO director,” an article published by World Intellectual Property Review (November 2021)
Quoted in “The State of Counterfeiting and Intellectual Property Theft,” which was published in Footwear Insight (February 2021)
Quoted in “How Booking.com Won Its Fight for a Trademark,” which was published in AdWeek (July 2020)
Quoted in, “Chaos is a Ladder for the Startup Lawyer,” an article published by Orange County Lawyer Magazine (February 2020)
Quoted in, “Mongols Convicted of Racketeering, but Trial Isn’t Over,” an article published by Court House News Service (January 2019)
Quoted in, “Judge Invites Amicus Briefing in Mongols Forfeiture Case,” an article published by Daily Journal (January 2019)